http://blog.cannabis.org.au OzCannaBlog - Not just another PressedWord site Mon, 03 Oct 2011 12:04:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://blog.cannabis.org.au/2011/10/the-case-for-legalising-drugs-public-forum-discussion-evening-ssdp-macquarie/#comment-36 Macciza Mon, 03 Oct 2011 12:04:41 +0000 http://blog.cannabis.org.au/?p=58#comment-36 High All, I am planning to get along to this - should be great night for like-minded folk to discuss things regarding the Cannabis Campaign . . . Hope to see some familiar faces, and some new ones as well . . . Cheers MM High All,
I am planning to get along to this – should be great night for like-minded folk to discuss things regarding the Cannabis Campaign . . .
Hope to see some familiar faces, and some new ones as well . . .
Cheers
MM

]]> http://blog.cannabis.org.au/2011/04/telegraph-story-makes-mockery-of-reporting/#comment-3 Macciza Sun, 24 Apr 2011 14:26:31 +0000 http://blog.cannabis.org.au/?p=13#comment-3 Thanks for that. Don't worry half or more of mine don't get through. This one has not appeared yet so I figured I would send this one: To the Editor, The title, graphic and lead-line of this article are highly objectionable in their use of sensationalism, derogatory images, and degrading descriptive terms of Cannabis consumers. Together they are highly discriminatory. They are also potentially in breach of the Australian Press Council Statement of Principles. I do not believe the headline reflects the tenor of the Audit report and the graphic is unrelated, gratuitous, misrepresentative and offensive. I believe the article as whole does not constitute 'accurate, fair and balanced' reporting. I would welcome a right of reply. Sincerely Macciza See what happens. Thanks for that. Don’t worry half or more of mine don’t get through. This one has not appeared yet so I figured I would send this one:
To the Editor,
The title, graphic and lead-line of this article are highly objectionable in their use of sensationalism, derogatory images, and degrading descriptive terms of Cannabis consumers. Together they are highly discriminatory.
They are also potentially in breach of the Australian Press Council Statement of Principles. I do not believe the headline reflects the tenor of the Audit report and the graphic is unrelated, gratuitous, misrepresentative and offensive. I believe the article as whole does not constitute ‘accurate, fair and balanced’ reporting.
I would welcome a right of reply.
Sincerely
Macciza
See what happens.

]]> http://blog.cannabis.org.au/2011/04/telegraph-story-makes-mockery-of-reporting/#comment-2 joe andrews Sun, 24 Apr 2011 09:18:36 +0000 http://blog.cannabis.org.au/?p=13#comment-2 I sent a comment but i should of thought it through more..but i doubt it will be published. But yeah, the main point i wanted to tell them was that they chose a picture of some crazy looking old guy, im pretty sure 99 percent of Mj smokers don't look like that.Trying to convey some sort of message that we are all jobless wierd looking people. I sent a comment but i should of thought it through more..but i doubt it will be published. But yeah, the main point i wanted to tell them was that they chose a picture of some crazy looking old guy, im pretty sure 99 percent of Mj smokers don’t look like that.Trying to convey some sort of message that we are all jobless wierd looking people.

]]>